|
Posted by Roxy Redpants on 23rd December 2009 at 05:34 PM Unbelievable Hypocrisy
By Roxy Redpants
I find it astonishing that Hazel Blears is now campaigning for a midwife-led maternity unit for Salford. It was Blears who supported the Labour Government's death warrant for Hope Hospital's maternity unit when she was a Labour cabinet minister. It seems there are no depths to which Blears will not plummet in saying one thing and doing another.
Comment by Guest 1st March 2010
Obviously I meant "did" not "has did" |
Comment by Guest 1st March 2010
I don't thinking practicing celibacy then looking at all the darkest and nastiest porn he could find has did much for his mental health. No wonder his imagination runs away with him when he sees a woman wearing a shorter than knee-length skirt. |
Comment by Albert.Spiby ( member ) 28th February 2010
Is it just me, or does everyone agree that Richard Carvath needs to get laid? Or at the very least give himself "A Happy Ending".
Not that I would wish that on anyone. |
Comment by Guest 4th January 2010
Hey Dickie, how's Wakefield?, you spend some time there if you get my drift.... |
Comment by Guest 4th January 2010
[sarcasm] because your "political opponents" will say mean things about it because you're such a credible candidate and they fear you and not because they think the video's rubbish or anything. [/sarcasm] |
Comment by Richard Carvath ( member ) 4th January 2010
Why do you think? |
Comment by Guest 4th January 2010
If you think your new YouTube video's so brilliant Richard, why have you disabled ratings and comments on it? |
Comment by Guest 4th January 2010
Says the 169th Id from Richard Carvath's IP |
Comment by Guest 3rd January 2010
Carvath won't care two hoots about anonymous criticism on here and he can take the knocks. In fact he'll probably be pleased by repeated silly rants against him because it publicises him at the same time as people see that his opponents are just silly ranters. If you did but realise it you're publicising him and making him look interesting to voters. General Elections are basically a popularity contest. To stand any chance of winning a candidate has got to be well known to the electorate. That's half the battle - probably much more than half the battle. You'd be surprised how little serious politics counts for. How many people ever read manifestos before they vote - if they bother to vote at all? Exactly. Carvath is doing what he has to do to win because that's what matters - there are no prizes for coming second. |
Comment by Guest 3rd January 2010
"If you ever watch Carvath with a crowd of women it's obvious that many of them are just frigging themselves to be near him - seriously" - One of Carvath's best quotes yet! (Yes Carvath, we all know it's you) The only time this would ever happen in real life is when Carvath had called a group of women coming out of a pub in short skirts "whores" and they were trying to get near him to batter him |
Comment by Guest 3rd January 2010
When Carvath pretends to be an anonymous political opponent that has such great respect for his political savy and know how it really is hilarious. Richard every single political figure that has heard of you has condemned you for your hate filled rantings and most just chose to ignore you as being unworthy of debate or their time. |
Comment by Guest 3rd January 2010
Carvath is without doubt the most deluded person in Salford if he thinks his "campaign" up to now has been anything but an unmitigated disaster, he has been exposed as a liar and has made almost more amateurish mistakes than he has enemies. I am reliably informed that a leaflet with some of the "best" of Carvath quotes will be widely distributed before the election and it should make hilarious reading!! |
Comment by Guest 3rd January 2010
Says Carvath ID No 168 |
Comment by Guest 3rd January 2010
Carvath has yet to put his pawns into play; he's only moved the bishop and the knight in his campaign so far. I'm not a Carvath supporter but I am a political activist and I think I understand the games he's played so far. Carvath is not stupid and people who think he is need to take a look in the mirror - and if people take him for a fool he can use that to his advantage, often with devastating effect. (For an example search Iain Lindley's archive for a thread where Carvath obliterated John Merry, who had clearly underestimated Carvath.) I would expect that Carvath will gradually reveal his support base over the coming weeks - and it is probably substantial. Carvath can expect the backing of all sorts of people: Catholic, Christian, pro life, men and women, protest voters, Richard Carvath fan club etc. If you think Carvath's unpopular with women you're well off. If you ever watch Carvath with a crowd of women it's obvious that many of them are just frigging themselves to be near him - seriously. Carvath will probably hold public meetings some time soon - all serious candidates will - and that's when you'll start to see how mistaken you are in your theory that he lacks supporters. There's a rumour at the moment that Carvath is in talks with rival indy Joe O'Neill about joining forces, i.e. concessions and commitments would be made and a deal done such that either Joe would drop out as a candidate and back Richard or vice versa. I won't be voting for Richard but I have to admit that all things considered his campaign is shaping up nicely. |
Comment by Guest 3rd January 2010
Carvath has managed to alienate all the homosexual and civil liberties voters, the Women voters (with his rants about them being whores if they wear short skirts or have sex outside of marriage as well as telling them they are'nt "strong" enough for jobs like the police) Almost every moderate / normal voter with his extremist views, in fact with the possible exception of some BNP voters who might like his anti multiculturalism and anti Islamic views I really can't see where he'll get his third vote from (assuming he's voting for himself and his mummy is too) |
Comment by Guest 3rd January 2010
Says Richard Carvath personality No164 |
Comment by Guest 3rd January 2010
Carvath is a very clever man. When you consider that he's an indy (with conservative social views and presumably very little money) standing in the Socialist Republic of Salford and where the Guardian Media Group - the politics behind which are dead set against Carvathian politics - has a stranglehold over all the media that really matters, it is remarkable the things he has achieved in coming to prominence in the last 6 months. If he can keep it up I believe he can win, especially if he builds up momentum by March. I suspect he hasn't played his best cards yet either. I'm not surprised that Neal Keeling and David Ottewell of the Manchester Evening News are running scared of Carvath; they probably realise that no matter how they might attempt to do a hatchet job on him it would backfire so they know that their best policy to help Blears get back in is to maintain a conspiracy of silence over Carvath in the MEN. |
Comment by Guest 3rd January 2010
I love it on Carvath's blog the bit where he describes the Hazel Must Go gang as a "freak show." Carvath's right it is a freak show. I also love Carvath's video the one where he parodies just about every political cliche going (or is he being serious as well), especially the bit where he gets stuck in to Norman Owen - it is a potent mix of classic English farce and biting satire with a political power punch and it works on so many levels its just pure genius. |
Comment by Guest 3rd January 2010
Roxy, Jennifer, Katie, Hannah..... More like MPD than NPD. lol. (Unless it's both.) |
Comment by Guest 3rd January 2010
The classic comment has to be "When I get political power" lol. Now a serious point is that this is where Dickie Carvath hides his true extremism under an exceptable veneer and it's what would make someone with his beliefs and half a brain (not him then) dangerous. Most reasonable people would be opposed to a brothel next to a church (even if your pro legalisation and control it just isn't a suitable place). But he then adds pornography and calls it prostitution by proxy and his definition includes any page 3 type pictures and wants to ban or severely edit TV and Films from Sex in The City to 15 rated films such as American Pie, the march by the girls painted by Fanny Gaugh in support of the troops for example would be banned and so would two women or two men holding hands in public !! He's even gone as far as to state on here that women that wear short skirts or revealing tops are dressed in "Prostitutes attire" and should expect to be called "Whores" if they don't cover up. He would have laws that would make us the most repressed and by far the most censored country in the western world, in fact the only countries that have laws anywhere near some or Carvaths views are the strict Islamic countries like Iran so perhaps he should consider a move? (And before you come pratteling on about being misquoted Richard please can you answer what country in Europe has laws that are even close to what your views are on what you call pornography?) A genuine extremist religious nutter or just a sexist homaphobic NPD sufferer, the choice is yours! |
Comment by Guest 3rd January 2010
Yup. Some profound insights in that video: "Now this place, 'Babes', I was at a Swinton Community Committee meeting at Salford Civic Centre last year, and Inspector Robert Findlow from Greater Manchester Police publicly confirmed that it is, in fact, a brothel, which is what we all know anyway - state the obvious - but it's good to know just exactly what the the police have to say about it, intit?" |
Comment by Guest 3rd January 2010
The day he admits he's doing this whole thing for a joke, I'll salute him as a genius. |
Comment by Guest 2nd January 2010
Have you seen his Brothelwatch Youtube video yet? This guy is a master at doing shamamateurism! He manages to put over a couple of serious points in a hammy video in true Salford scally style. This video is sheer brilliance, you will cack your pants laughing while Carvath also hammers home the issue and the location so nobody will forget. |
Comment by Guest 2nd January 2010
Either that or an incredibly adept troll. |
Comment by Guest 2nd January 2010
It does seem that he doesn't differentiate between the vast number of negative reports or comments and the odd neutral one such as his disclosing the numbers of abortions carried out (as far as I can see there is nothing positive whatsoever written by anyone else). Any normal person would surely despair at the almost universal disdain and disgust that his extremist views have been received with but Richard is obviously only bothered by how many times his name is mentioned. He is obviously a very troubled individual. RB |
Comment by Guest 2nd January 2010
Also notice that he has totalled up the number of times his name has been mentioned in the Salford Advertiser in 2009, and broken it down by number of different editions, articles, letters (both by and about him), the number of his times his photo has appeared ( which was 4 ). The fact that some of the articles and letters slated him seems not to be an issue. A strong case of NPD. |
Comment by Guest 2nd January 2010
Interestingly after being caught with his pants down telling lies on here by the Editorial team Carvath is now saying that the internet is of minimal importance. He is apparently really pleased with the coverage he's had in the printed media even though that almost all of it has been slaughtering him for his homophobic comments on Matthew and his insulting comments about women who contract cancer after being sexually active outside of marriage being deserving of their fate for their lack of morals. It reinforces the widely held view that Carvath will say and do anything for attention and that in his little deluded world any publicity or attention is good for him and shows that without doubt the decision taken to curtail his activities on here was the correct one. |
Comment by Guest 1st January 2010
Are you saying that you haven't made comments about all of the media outlets mentioned Richard because two of them are still on other blogs and I have a screen save of your imaginary conversation with a reporter at the hazel must go meeting and your recent comments about the guardian group "censoring" you. RB |
Comment by Guest 1st January 2010
I see you're not refuting the fact you have NPD though =) |
Comment by Richard Carvath ( member ) 1st January 2010
[It is a tedious irritation to have to do this but...] In regard of the last anonymous comment I must point out that none of the attributed remarks given in quotation marks are genuine - they are all fabricated. |
Comment by Guest 1st January 2010
Carvaths comments on here "It is a fact that this website operates below the standards of the mainstream press - way below." is extreemly interesting considering some of his other comments on other media sources. "BBC won't inteview him because he's a Christian (comments made by Carvath regarding a Hazel must go meeting)" "SalforStar is a Joke run by students" (comments after a report on Carvath harassing a woman during a brothelwatch incident) The Guardian Media Group are "unprofessional and pro PC and against Carvath" (comments made recently in his spat with Mr Tippets over Carvaths homophobia).... Is there ANY media outlet you don't have a problem with Richard and have you considered that YOU are the problem not everyone else?? |
Comment by Guest 1st January 2010
That list of symptoms could have been written wit Richard Carvath in mind! His inability to see how others view him and his delusional view that he has any power or influence (such as his threat to fire his non-existant guns at the editorial staff). His frequents torrent of abuse at various social groups and individuals and his blatant attempts to try and manipulate the public with random comments under false IDs very much reinforces the overall picture of his behaviour being a result of NPD. RB |
Comment by Guest 1st January 2010
Sometimes he's so socially awkward though, I wonder if he has some unusual combination of NPD and Asperger's. |
Comment by Guest 1st January 2010
That's a very good point and I've been saying Richard's an NPD for months. |
Comment by Guest 1st January 2010
The DSM-IV Diagnostic Criteria for Narcissistic Personality Disorder are:
A. A pervasive pattern of grandiosity, need for admiration, lack of empathy, as indicated by at least five of:
1. a grandiose sense of self-importance
2. is preoccupied with fantasies of unlimited success, power, brilliance, beauty, or ideal love
3. believes that he or she is "special" and can only be understood by, or should associate with, other special or high-status people (or institutions)
4. requires excessive admiration
5. has a sense of entitlement, ie unreasonable expectations of especially favourable treatment or automatic compliance with his or her expectations
6. is interpersonally exploitative, ie takes advantage of others to achieve his or her own ends
7. lacks empathy and is unwilling to recognize or identify with the feelings and needs of others
8. is often envious of others or believes that others are envious of him or her
9. shows arrogant, haughty behaviours or attitudes |
Comment by Guest 1st January 2010
Richards low IQ perhaps?? |
Comment by Guest 1st January 2010
Richard - If you post comments in your own favour under a pseudonym or "by Guest" and the "mystery commenter" has the exact same IP address as you, when you log in under your own name, that certainly is proof of something. |
Comment by Guest 31st December 2009
Waterpistol is about right Richard and as for all the comments, any idiot can have publicity if his views are controversial enough and in all the 1000s of words written about you how much support was there and how much condemnation ?? Happy new year . RB |
Comment by Richard Carvath ( member ) 31st December 2009
That would be why you have the courage to criticise me in total anonymity would it? My insignificance explains the thousands of words written about me on the internet in the last 6 months does it not? Nobody writes about a nobody, and nobody posts anonymously who is not concerned about the damage which could be inflicted to their reputation by an opponent if their identity was known. Believe me, I'm tempted to fire my guns pretty much on a daily basis now - and not just in regard of SalfordOnline either. I will not fire my guns at SalfordOnline now, but allow me just a little squirt of my waterpistol... SalfordOnline is the 'Salford' website that did not report at all on the abortion figures for Salford Royal which I made public in November [3,707 abortion victims at Salford Royal, 2004 - 2008] but which wets its pants in excitement over preserving a lump of wood (the totem pole)! 3,707 Salford people murdered - SalfordOnline not interested. Save lump of wood - SalfordOnline passionate and very enthusiastic. I think this one example speaks volumes. Right.... I'm off out now, it's New Year's Eve, have a good one everybody and Happy New Year! |
Comment by Guest 31st December 2009
Fire my guns!!! You do take yourself ever so seriously don't you Dickie (Shame nobody else does) your an intellectual pygmy and your "guns" are peashooters you muppet. |
Comment by Richard Carvath ( member ) 31st December 2009
I've been sorely tempted to make a detailed public comment about exactly what I think of SalfordOnline and why for some time now but I will continue to resist that temptation at least until after the election (unless the website does something so outrageously provocative as to force the need to fire my guns). For now I will say nothing more than that I think this website has some serious issues in regards of professionalism, integrity, style and editorial ethics. It is a fact that this website operates below the standards of the mainstream press - way below. The website has alluded to IPs as though this is some sort of proof of something but it is proof or nothing so their mention of it is mischievous to say the least. Do not the website staff and volunteers use the "Comment by Guest" facility themselves? I'd be very surprised if that's not the case. This website has effectively censored me from all but posting comments despite never finding fault with any of my blog articles in regard of the site's Content Policy; I think it's understandable why I might 'have beef' with SalfordOnline but details will have to wait. |
Comment by Guest 31st December 2009
So the Salford Online staff are telling lies about your posting under other names then are they Richard !!! Yet another conspiracy to prevent god's chosen man fulfilling his destiny of leading us all into a Carvathian utopia I suppose, you really are a paranoid little freak aren't you |
Comment by Guest 31st December 2009
The single best thing that could be done to improve thhis site would be to get rid of the "Comment by Richard Carvath" facility. |
Comment by Guest 31st December 2009
So a grand total of nothing archived then Richard. I have to say that you campaign against Asda selling the spoof film "Zombie Strippers" was one of the daftest and funniest "protests" of last year. Your widespread coverage has been almost entirely critical and you being slaughtered in the press. Your "book" and blogs have been universally ridiculed and in excess of 95% of the comments on your blogs many by other people have been anti-Carvath to be nice about it. Your banned from swamping Salford Online with your rubbish and The Advertiser have publicly slaughtered you on a couple of occasions. Nothing you have done has been endorsed by anyone of note and you've been dubbed the most homophobic and sexist man in Salford and have been caught out on here with lie after lie. Congratulations it's been a master class in how not to do it!!! |
Comment by Richard Carvath ( member ) 31st December 2009
I only post on SalfordOnline when logged in under my own name. Inevitably there are those who want to believe otherwise but it happens to be the truth. As a contributor to SalfordOnline who appears under his full real name I'm one of the handful of people on here who isn't anonymous and who doesn't play the silly games that the Anons do or use anonymity to write outrageous nonsense. In my opinion the single biggest thing that would improve this website would be to require everybody to register and log in and ditch the "Comment by Guest" facility which is abused non-stop by many people. |
Comment by Guest 31st December 2009
Absolutely right Richard you tell 'em, but don’t forget the other stuff too, remember how you promised not to post “in the third person” you lied, remember when you promised that you would only ever post on Salfordonline under your own name, you lied. Yes Richard I can see how you are trying to be just like a proper politian, keep on going all the way to election time – I can’t wait! Terry Smart from Farnworth |
Comment by Guest 31st December 2009
Richard Carvath, just a handful of 2009 examples........... International human rights casework: Orissa (India) genocide; Gojra (Pakistan) massacre. National level political campaign work in UK: Pro life lobbying, Vogelenzang freedom of speech trial. Local: Backed save Barton Moss, Albion Green and St. George's; run Brothelwatch; campaigned against Asda pornography; FOI exclusive on Salford Royal abortions. Publications: released 180,000 word book and several other major works including Islam: the Truth, The Execution of Justice, Heterophobia. Blogs: 50,000+ words of blogs in 2009. Repeated coverage in Salford Advertiser news articles. Widespread internet coverage on various news and political sites. Parliamentary candidate. Death threats for campaign work against serious and organised prostitution networks. This is just the tip of the iceberg for one year (and Carvath has been around for many years). I think Carvath deserves a little more respect. Next year we'll probably get a better picture of the man and his work in the run up to the General Election. |
Comment by Guest 31st December 2009
Your not a serious political story though are you Richard. An attention starved non entity who keeps "challenging" people to televised or public debate in the vain hope that someone, anyone might take you up and give you some of the attention you so desperately crave is far more accurate. Is this about the tenth time you tried this tactic and when your ignored for not being worth the time or effort you'll declare another stunning Carvath victory because the opposition are "scared" of facing you as opposed to hoping you'll go away like a spoilt child if they don't give you any attention!! |
Comment by Richard Carvath ( member ) 31st December 2009
It's up to young Miss Davis. She can email me anytime. Several months ago I expressed my displeasure with the conduct of Emma (and Tony Thornborough) in regard of the Martin Bell meeting. There are several points which I might make about Emma here - all of them fair and valid - but it would be pointless as they would simply be deleted. I might get away with simply restating my observation in the wake of the Martin Bell meeting, which was to the effect that a pretty face does not a good journalist make. If Emma wants to do a serious political interview rather than blog about Christmas leftovers then if she's not afraid of me and if she's capable of covering serious issues for half an hour then I'll look forward to hearing from her. |
Comment by Guest 31st December 2009
Have you told Emma Davis about your warts and all exposure Dickie, if you will pardon the pun, I look forward to this "exclusive", not. |
Comment by Guest 28th December 2009
The new word is homopervuality btw |
Comment by Guest 28th December 2009
Oh jeez - I've just seen his blog. He's making up words now. |
Comment by Richard Carvath ( member ) 24th December 2009
Well now there's a question! There are definitely no men in my past! As it so happens, I'm considering doing an exclusive tell-all interview with SalfordOnline's Emma Davis in the new year... watch this space. |
Comment by Guest 24th December 2009
She may well have behaved disgracefully but she will retain her seat |
Comment by Guest 24th December 2009
GET BACK TO THE THREAD PLEASE lets not forget about the disgraceful way crocodile tears blears has behaved |
Comment by Guest 24th December 2009
RC - have you ever had a twosome with anybody? Male or female. |
Comment by Guest 23rd December 2009
That's an astonishing piece of news Richard =) |
Comment by Richard Carvath ( member ) 23rd December 2009
I'd just like to confirm that I've never had a threesome with Hannah Harper. |
Comment by Guest 23rd December 2009
I think that's what you call a mixed metaphor, guest #1. I'm not saying I disagree with you though. |
Comment by Guest 23rd December 2009
I don't recommend doing a google image search for either "Hannah Harper" or "Katie Kay" by the way. |
Comment by Guest 23rd December 2009
As I pointed out in the comment thread for the S.O. blog article "Bigots are Buggers" by Peter Tatchell (before the whole article got deleted for being copy-and-pasted presumably), RC has created ANOTHER alliterative female pseudonym called Hannah Harper who is ALSO a female porn star like "Katie Kay" was. "Hannah" posted on RC's blog - in the "Is Clarkson Sephton's Gay Boyfriend?" comment thread - claiming she had a threesome with Richard. Bizarre. |
Comment by Guest 23rd December 2009
P*ss off Carvath, you deluded half wit. Oh Gosh!, Roxy is worried!!, sorry Dickie, at least come up with a half decent non de plume. |
Comment by Guest 23rd December 2009
she has got a brass neck you could strike matches on her she is that hard faced |
Due to problems with spam only SalfordOnline members can now leave comments. Becoming a member of SalfordOnline only takes a minute, just hit the red Join Us button at the top right hand side of the page to create your Personal account.
|
